MWLConsulting.com - All Types of Training

 Search
 Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » Art Training » Computer Mathematics » Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden BraidJanuary 7, 2009  


Categories
Computer Training
Teacher Training
Medical Training
Art Training
Medicine
Business
Yoga
Sports
Law
Art
Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
enlarge
Author: Douglas R. Hofstadter
Publisher: Basic Books
Category: Book

List Price: $22.95
Buy New: $7.17
You Save: $15.78 (69%)
Buy New/Used/Collectible from $7.17

Avg. Customer Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars(244 reviews)
Sales Rank: 2678

Languages: English (Original Language), English (Unknown), English (Published)
Media: Paperback
Edition: 20 Anv
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 832
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.4
Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.5 x 1.3

ISBN: 0465026567
Dewey Decimal Number: 510.1
EAN: 9780465026562
ASIN: 0465026567

Publication Date: February 4, 1999
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 6-10 of 244
 « PREV  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
... 49   NEXT »

5 out of 5 stars My favourite book - ever!   June 9, 2008
This is one of my favourite book of all time. I first read it twenty years ago as an undergraduate on my computer science degree. The nice thing about getting older, but still remaining young, is that you can go back and revistit master works - and lets make no bones about it, this is a master work. As such, it requires time, effort and mastery of the ideas.
This is not a book that you can just pick up and read in a couple of days. Of course you can delve into it and loose yourself for a few hours, but to obtain mastery will take serious time and effort. Using Howard Gardener's terminology, Hofstadter synthesises across the domains of music, maths and art. This is no mean feat.
Buy it, only if you have the time for it. Treasure it, enjot it and love it as much as I do.



1 out of 5 stars Abstruse and over-rated   April 20, 2008
  9 out of 29 found this review helpful

The author complains in the new preface that a vast majority of the reviewers, including those who have rated this book very highly, seem to have no idea of what he has been trying to say. In my opinion, this is a self-indictment that does not leave much for others to say. If the author cannot get his ideas across in 700 pages, perhaps people should not waste their time on him. I have learnt it the hard way: after buying this book, five years ago, on high recommendations of friends, only to find it so boring and confused that I could never go beyond a few pages even though I gave it innumerable attempts.


5 out of 5 stars Magnum Opus on Intelligence   March 28, 2008
  2 out of 2 found this review helpful

I realized after recommending this to a friend that I've never reviewed it. Strange, since it's one of the dozen most important books I've ever read in my nearly half-century on this planet. I first read it over 20 years ago, and continue to refer to its literate and well-crafted pages frequently.

This book is Doug Hofstadter's religion. Since it's so good and so right about so many things, people run off into strange places with Hofstadter's words, sort of like the Bible. GEB (the shorthand name for the book) is, for me, a meta-level examination of what it is to be human. Some people see the shadows of the gods in there. I'm not trying to be melodramatic, nor do I believe I'm overstating the value of this book.

Hofstadter takes the reader along on a Carrollian trip using metaphor and fable. Then he employs pedagogical, practical exercises, and good old-fashion lecture. Rinse and repeat, again and again. When he tells you to get pen and paper, please do it. Take your time with this book. I tried and failed on my first attempt. When I finally settled into it, it took me three months to joyously work my way through it. Take a year if you need it.

Reception, analysis, recursion, reapplication. Hofstadter examines the basic evidences of intelligence, forms sensible, fundamental meta-rules, and builds from there. This book - as others have said - is hard work, like climbing a mountain. But at the end of the endeavor, the view is dazzling.



5 out of 5 stars Wow... Deep thoughts, and Abstract Perspectives   February 8, 2008
  2 out of 2 found this review helpful

I have not completed this book, and I am not sure you can ever say that you are complete with a book of this magnitude, however, it will certainly be a book I will review again and again. If you want to be challenged intellectually, this book would be the ticket. I enjoy a good challenge, and although it isn't a 'fun' read, it is valuable book to have in your personal library if you are interested in a paradigm shift in your reality.


4 out of 5 stars HOFSTADER'S ERROR(By James E. Spinosa)   January 28, 2008
  1 out of 24 found this review helpful

After studying Douglas R. Hofstader's brilliant book, I discovered an error in the proof of Godel's first incompleteness theorem that invalidates the proof. The same error is in Newman & Nagel's book Godel's Proof.
The error occurs on page 447. The incorrect statement is, "a' is the arithmoquinification of u." The statement should read: a' is the arithmoquinification of the numeric value of the Godel number u. The term u represents the Godel number of a specific formula, and the word arithmoquinification is a portmanteau word coined by the author.
Godel's theorem is derived by arithmoquining a formula that Hofstader calls the "uncle" formula. On page 447, he writes,"Now all we need to do
is-arithmoquine this very uncle! What this entails is 'booting out' all the free variables-of which there is only one,namely a"-and putting in the
numeral for u everywhere. This gives us: ~Ea:Ea': where the number of S's equals the numeral for u." That is Hofstader's version of Godel's theorem or G. On page 447
he offers this interpretation of the theorem,"There do not exist numbers a
& a' that both(1)they form a TNT-proof-pair, and(2)a' is the arithmoquinification of u." But,as I have pointed out Godel's theorem does
not declare part(2)of his interpretation. Instead, the correct interpretation of part(2)is, a' is the arithmoquinification of the numeral of the Godel number u. The numeral of the Godel number u cannot be
arithmoquined because it is not a formula and therefore has neither a Godel number nor a free variable.
This invalidates the proof because we no longer have a true statement: a'
is the arithmoquinification of u that cannot be proven. Instead we have a
false statement that cannot be proven. For more info & essays on this subject,please go to www.jimssciencepage.info



Powered by Associate-O-Matic